Town 1-2 Derby
My Summary
A good performance in both directions marred by a mistake and some poor finishing.
While it was influenced by Derby not needing to score for 65 minutes 1.94-0.57 is still a very good xG scoreline and really quite unlucky to get the result we did.
Attack
I’ve seen a lot of suggestions that last night we were poor going forward, or at the very least no better than we used to be; so let’s take a closer look at this claim.
Last night we created 1.94 xG,which for a start suggests we were quite unlucky not to score a second; on balance either Kachunga or Schindler should have scored.
According to xG, last season we only produced more chances to score on one occasion, away at Bournemouth (an oddly similar game, conceding two silly goals early on, then getting one back quickly but not being able to finish the job). This would suggest that this attacking display was improved from last season, but this result alone is nowhere near definitive.
For a start we got a penalty, which wouldn’t have happened last year, so if we remove all penalties from xG values and look again; how often did we put out a better attacking performance in the Premier League - xG higher than 1.17.
In that case it has increased to 8 games.
Bournemouth A, West Ham H+A, Wolves H, Arsenal H, Man United A, Fulham H, Crystal Palace H
So about 20% of last season had better attacking performances, so this would still be above average. If you take into account a supposedly weaker opposition and that we have the same forwards, it actually suggests that it’s more likely we are on par with last year attacking wise.
In summary, it’s way too early to decide if we are any better or worse going forward but this first game alone certainly doesn’t suggest we are worse, we just need to find a clinical edge.
Defence
In defence there was those mistakes that have plagued us for a while and ultimately that was the difference. It’s hard to compare how many chances we let Derby have compared to another performance because after the 25th minute they had no need to go forward. But still for anyone interested we only limited 3 teams to less chances last year: Cardiff A, Burnley A, Wolves H.
Expected table
Position Name Expected Position
1 Brentford 6.911
2 Swansea 7.174
3 Leeds 7.663
4 Huddersfield 7.859
5 Wigan 8.138
6 QPR 9.409
7 Luton 10.139
8 West Brom 10.199
9 Readin 10.768
10 Preston 11.189
11 Barnsley 11.909
12 Sheff Wed 12.088
13 Charlton 12.158
14 Milwall 12.475
15 Stoke 13.396
16 Forest 13.554
17 Middlesbrough 14.313
18 Fulham 15.29
19 Blackburn 15.41
20 Cardiff 16.12
21 Hull 16.426
22 Derby 18.176
23 Bristol City 18.466
24 Birmingham 20.77
A good performance in both directions marred by a mistake and some poor finishing.
While it was influenced by Derby not needing to score for 65 minutes 1.94-0.57 is still a very good xG scoreline and really quite unlucky to get the result we did.
Attack
I’ve seen a lot of suggestions that last night we were poor going forward, or at the very least no better than we used to be; so let’s take a closer look at this claim.
Last night we created 1.94 xG,which for a start suggests we were quite unlucky not to score a second; on balance either Kachunga or Schindler should have scored.
According to xG, last season we only produced more chances to score on one occasion, away at Bournemouth (an oddly similar game, conceding two silly goals early on, then getting one back quickly but not being able to finish the job). This would suggest that this attacking display was improved from last season, but this result alone is nowhere near definitive.
For a start we got a penalty, which wouldn’t have happened last year, so if we remove all penalties from xG values and look again; how often did we put out a better attacking performance in the Premier League - xG higher than 1.17.
In that case it has increased to 8 games.
Bournemouth A, West Ham H+A, Wolves H, Arsenal H, Man United A, Fulham H, Crystal Palace H
So about 20% of last season had better attacking performances, so this would still be above average. If you take into account a supposedly weaker opposition and that we have the same forwards, it actually suggests that it’s more likely we are on par with last year attacking wise.
In summary, it’s way too early to decide if we are any better or worse going forward but this first game alone certainly doesn’t suggest we are worse, we just need to find a clinical edge.
Defence
In defence there was those mistakes that have plagued us for a while and ultimately that was the difference. It’s hard to compare how many chances we let Derby have compared to another performance because after the 25th minute they had no need to go forward. But still for anyone interested we only limited 3 teams to less chances last year: Cardiff A, Burnley A, Wolves H.
Expected table
Position Name Expected Position
1 Brentford 6.911
2 Swansea 7.174
3 Leeds 7.663
4 Huddersfield 7.859
5 Wigan 8.138
6 QPR 9.409
7 Luton 10.139
8 West Brom 10.199
9 Readin 10.768
10 Preston 11.189
11 Barnsley 11.909
12 Sheff Wed 12.088
13 Charlton 12.158
14 Milwall 12.475
15 Stoke 13.396
16 Forest 13.554
17 Middlesbrough 14.313
18 Fulham 15.29
19 Blackburn 15.41
20 Cardiff 16.12
21 Hull 16.426
22 Derby 18.176
23 Bristol City 18.466
24 Birmingham 20.77
Comments
Post a Comment